Can science ever critique art in a
meaningful way?
Why not?
The deeper you fall into the world of science, the more you realize the
necessity of a philosophical point of view.
The field of science is ever-expanding because of the need human beings
have of finding answers to any proposed questions. So you can say, with full
certainty, that one must have a good imagination to thrive in the sciences. How
else are you going to prove theorems, study the universe, or the beings that
take part in it?
One can view art as an expression of feeling or a particular thought,
and that is part of human behavior, which is studied and therefore analyzed.
What then, can stop science from making significant statements on art?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario